Wednesday, September 9, 2009

#801 Jethro Lazenby Cave - the NO shots


All Images /Ragpony

Here's the Jethro Cave editorial that accompanied that great NO Magazine article I blogged about last week. I don't own a scanner (or even Microsoft Word for that matter), but I'm very lucky to have a best good friend like Emma Gleason over at Ragpony who painstakingly scanned all the shots for me. Thanks Emma! One thing I'm confused about with the editorial/article is that Per says that Jethro has a tattoo on his chest but in the shots below he clearly doesn't. Conspiracy? Or something else... I've been to about a billion NYFW castings with Michael today and I keep expecting to bump into Jethro but no dice. I know that he has a showcard with Request so maybe he'll show up in the next couple of days... at the shows.







Uploaded with my Sierra Wireless data stick on Telecom XT.

I LIKE YOU!

12 comments:

Sweetface McGee said...

they look awesome.. but weird, he definitely does have a tattoo on his chest, its a little hand drawn face of some kind. Could these shots have been taken years ago?

Isaac Likes said...

Peculiar....

Emma said...

thanks for the shoutout Isaac!
I noticed that about his ink too. was v confused. could it be an old shoot? because he definitely has that chest tattoo.

It's visibile in those shots Hedi Slimane took of him:
http://www.hedislimane.com/fashiondiary/index.php?id=59

and his Russh editorial from the March 09 issue:
http://img46.imagevenue.com/img.php?loc=loc106&image=53649_russh27_jethro5_122_106lo.jpg

K said...

That shoot is featured on this blog from May... so it's definitely not NEW new.

http://ilikeyoursundaypersonalitybetter.blogspot.com/2009/05/one-hundred-and-eighty-nine.html

Anonymous said...

That shot was shot exclusively for No Magazine

Isaac Likes said...

So... it was shot exclusively for NO but it ended up on a blog before it was published?

Leonie said...

photoshop?

Anonymous said...

shot for previous issue but held over.

Anonymous said...

sorry that was ment to have a ?? on it, i'm just a guessing

NO magazine said...

Yo Isaac,

The shoot came to NO as a submission several months ago and we've been keeping it in mind since then. We have magazine exclusive rights to our pictures, but as our full website is still under construction (coming very soon!) we didn't negotiate web. Not surprised it popped up somewhere as it is a great shoot.

The tattoo I guess was post-shoot - NO does not remove tattoos (or other charming personal idiosyncrasies!), we like keepin' it real!

Mel @ NO

Isaac Likes said...

Thanks for clearing that one up Mel!

Emma said...

Mystery finally solved. It's such a good shoot too - the boy always look great in black and white.